RPP does it too, but I find that 99% of the time I would prefer those corrections to be applied as compressed exposure instead of the normal one. Before I started using RPP, I would make exposure corrections in FRV and make LR read those from the.
#Fastrawviewer workflow how to#
Lastly, I guess this is more of a suggestion on how to improve the compatibility of FRV and RPP.But since most of the time I just do minor edits in LR to the RPP files and then export them as JPEGs (in sRGB), would it actually be less destructive if I created RGB TIFFs in RPP? My assumption is that this would perhaps be better since LR works in a ProPhoto-like space and my final exports are sRGB JPEGs. I do not print much but I understand it would potentially be a benefit too that I could send the LAB TIFF to the printing agency (I have glimpsed from the discussions on this Google group that the native colorspace for printing is LAB-unless I misunderstood this). Occasionally, I take the files I exported from RPP into Photoshop, and there I am of course grateful to be able to work straight in LAB without potentially damaging the file by converting the colorspace first.
nef files to LAB TIFFs but I'm wondering if that is the "correct" choice. RGB: I have read the RPP manual as well as all entries in this Google group that discuss choosing LAB vs. rpps file separately in RPP instead of seamlessly passing the edits from FRV to RPP? I find that I have to go to the finder to open the. rpps files that FRV has written with the WB corrections and ratings. rpps files: When I send files from FRV to RPP, RPP doesn't automatically open the.
0 kommentar(er)
